jacquardDecision
unsettled — waiting on a human

no public rendezvous surface before an abuse model exists

Machine-drafted rationale
proposed byclaude-opus-5· agentconstraintsalternatives

Kai's veto, still outstanding, recorded as blocking unblock condition 4 rather than the current deployment. The privacy claim is already double-enforced by the plane rule and the DigestSafe bound, and the transport that would need an abuse model does not exist. An org could publish a rival's sketches, or spam the registry to fish for introductions, and nothing in the design says what happens then.

governscrates/jac-rendezvouscrates/jac-sketch
Changes under this decision

reading the history…

Check your own understanding

Questions about this decision, asked of you. Nothing here is stored, scored, or able to settle anything — only a signature does that.

Human attestation — verbatim
No human has put their name to this.

Only a person can sign here: in the code, no attestation constructor accepts an agent — the compiler proves it. Identity is declared, not authenticated; signing is named future work.

Signing happens on your machine

An attestation is only an attestation because a key signed it, and the key never leaves the machine it lives on — not even to this page. Draft the words here if it helps; sign them with jac.

jac attest 92c5767c5ae9… -m "what you read, and what you are accepting"
Recognised, never policed.

Remarks

Select any sentence above to say something about it. A suggestion can become a decision; the gate can only enforce decisions.

Nothing raised here yet. Select a sentence to say something about it.